inexm's blog
photo category too fucking brainless sensitive...
since when a man wearing a underwear is consider softcore/hardcore?
in that case since superman should have censor the big silver screen, and all those superheroes movies as well! WWE too...swim match, gymnastic, wrestling sports too...
GUYS please review the photo with your brain not your fucking cock horniness!
too many pussies sissies here!
MF should even put my profile pic as hardcore, it show my male tits, many pussies sissies jack off to tits!
MuscPecPunch (10)
2020-12-25 오후 8:25I've seen real inconsistency with photo reviews. I understand it's intent, but often far too subjective or personally biased.
inexm (4)
2020-12-26 오후 1:55(이 글에 대한 답글)
Too many sissy fem here to rate the photo
LeighLadtoWrestle (1)
2020-12-26 오후 3:21You can only rate them within parameters set by the site. A guy in trunks seem to be deemed semi porn even when clearly not stiff. I find the levels very tame indeed
inexm (4)
2020-12-26 오후 3:40(이 글에 대한 답글)
There are actual guide for the rating, but members simply rate with their dick not their brain…
The Sting (10)
2021-07-04 오전 12:05There doesn't seem to be consistency in approval. The trouble I had getting my profile pic accepted was beyond ridiculous - and none of the rejected pics were sexual. Yet there are loads of members with profile pics that wouldn't be allowed now.
To be honest I think the red hand censorship is way over the top and out of date. We are all adults on this site so let people see all the pics that have been posted. Have they seen what's accepted on Twitter!! The only reason I can see is they want people to be donors so they refuse viewing them unless you are. It's so calculating
inexm (4)
2021-07-04 오후 12:55(이 글에 대한 답글)
true, must be the donation