In Australia it is often the opposite to first to cum wins,
but instead that first to cum loses, the idea being that if
you can get the other guy to cum first either by trapping
him in a hold and manually working him till he cums,
or he just cums first because he can't hold out from
cumming, that he is the loser being less strong to
resist cumming. Either first to cum wins or first to cum
losers are enjoyed by different guys.
Agree with Matsteve - First to cum loses is the way to rassle. by the way Steve- take you on in a nude
first to cum loses match. You got the balls for it?
The idea in first to cums wins is whom has the more powerful cock and can cum on command. Its a battle of virility between alphas. Its not about who can last longer.
it is obviously a wrong assumption by this this guy
and he obviously has the wrong person
i am not the guy he obviously thinks has
given out numbers, as I am always discrete
so please do not assume it is the case
that is ridiculous and i have done no such thing
you are seriously mistaken
i could not be bothered with that type of behaviour
so look elsewhere for your real or imagined person
Ok then tell me this how come after only days after our match I am getting texts from people I do t know about my lousy treatment of others when I walked out on our. match as I apologised to you and then got abusive messages from you saying that just because I was not into the match that I am a loserboi
Hey Jobberpunisher, you have a nice profile man. I only wish I was there to wrestle you. If that was the case, then it's definitely wrong to give out personal info on such a public forum.
Here is one of the texts that have been sent to me
Just heard about you and word is being passed around in Oz and overseas wrestle circles about your lousy actions. Will all catch up with you soon mate what comes around goes around and people are on your case you will be a pariah mate and won't get away with it Simon
Ticklish (0)
2016-07-15 오후 10:22How does this work? Do you have to stop the other guy from cumming, or pin the other guy and make them cum?
Either would actually be awesome.
auscol (0)
2016-07-18 오전 8:36(이 글에 대한 답글)
In Australia it is often the opposite to first to cum wins,
but instead that first to cum loses, the idea being that if
you can get the other guy to cum first either by trapping
him in a hold and manually working him till he cums,
or he just cums first because he can't hold out from
cumming, that he is the loser being less strong to
resist cumming. Either first to cum wins or first to cum
losers are enjoyed by different guys.
matsteve (2)
2016-07-24 오후 2:11(이 글에 대한 답글)
Seems to me that first to cum loses would make more sense and be more of a challenge.
zbobsled (0)
2016-07-30 오후 7:11(이 글에 대한 답글)
I have to agree with you. My challenge is preventing myself from cumming.
auscol (0)
2016-07-24 오후 9:05(이 글에 대한 답글)
agree first to cum loses makes more sense
and a bigger challenge
hardonthemat (63)
2016-07-24 오후 5:48(이 글에 대한 답글)
Agree with Matsteve - First to cum loses is the way to rassle. by the way Steve- take you on in a nude
first to cum loses match. You got the balls for it?
zbobsled (0)
2016-07-30 오후 7:12(이 글에 대한 답글)
I do not get the first to cum wins. I would probably win every match...lol
OilFighter (1)
2016-07-25 오전 12:45(이 글에 대한 답글)
The idea in first to cums wins is whom has the more powerful cock and can cum on command. Its a battle of virility between alphas. Its not about who can last longer.
bigbear (8 )
2016-07-16 오전 9:11(이 글에 대한 답글)
Hi think both guys jackoff and its first to shoot thereload
auscol (0)
2016-07-11 오전 8:44i will take on any guy in a first to cum loses wrestle
OilFighter (1)
2016-07-18 오전 4:12(이 글에 대한 답글)
First to cum loses? And why are you giving out other peoples number?
auscol (0)
2016-07-18 오전 4:19(이 글에 대한 답글)
it is obviously a wrong assumption by this this guy
and he obviously has the wrong person
i am not the guy he obviously thinks has
given out numbers, as I am always discrete
so please do not assume it is the case
hardonthemat (63)
2016-07-18 오후 7:01(이 글에 대한 답글)
Hey -always UP to fight - "first to cum - loses". Bring it.
Jobberpunisher (16)
2016-07-18 오전 4:03(이 글에 대한 답글)
Hey auscol why are you giving my number out to other guys here and getting them to slander me
OilFighter (1)
2016-07-18 오전 4:10(이 글에 대한 답글)
Thats just wrong dude.
auscol (0)
2016-07-18 오전 4:08(이 글에 대한 답글)
that is ridiculous and i have done no such thing
you are seriously mistaken
i could not be bothered with that type of behaviour
so look elsewhere for your real or imagined person
Jobberpunisher (16)
2016-07-18 오전 4:50(이 글에 대한 답글)
Ok then tell me this how come after only days after our match I am getting texts from people I do t know about my lousy treatment of others when I walked out on our. match as I apologised to you and then got abusive messages from you saying that just because I was not into the match that I am a loserboi
mochablk (23)
2016-07-24 오후 4:55(이 글에 대한 답글)
Hey Jobberpunisher, you have a nice profile man. I only wish I was there to wrestle you. If that was the case, then it's definitely wrong to give out personal info on such a public forum.
OilFighter (1)
2016-07-20 오전 1:11(이 글에 대한 답글)
Dude lets both take him on!
Jobberpunisher (16)
2016-07-18 오전 4:54(이 글에 대한 답글)
Here is one of the texts that have been sent to me
Just heard about you and word is being passed around in Oz and overseas wrestle circles about your lousy actions. Will all catch up with you soon mate what comes around goes around and people are on your case you will be a pariah mate and won't get away with it Simon
cyclone74 (32)
2016-08-12 오전 1:34(이 글에 대한 답글)
Did he threaten you!
OilFighter (1)
2016-07-09 오후 10:54Same old losers re challenging me.
alphamachostud (0)
2016-07-08 오전 3:41I've never lost a first to cum match either I will milk u woof
OilFighter (1)
2016-07-08 오전 12:37I'm back punks! Still the champ under 45 seconds.