I really do t care for it. Probably because I’m comparing it with the original.
It looks to scripted and contrived. In the original WOS we had characters and dare i say some of them could actually wrestle.
From what I've seen of it, I'd have to say, "What's the point?" It's nothing but modern day pro-wrestling. They seem to have missed the fact that what made WOS memorable was that it used an actual rule set, with refs that were there for more than just a comedy routine. When the heels cheated in the WOS days, it meant more.
Not seen much (only on when in gym). Seems to be the usual poorly judged UK attempt to imitate the worst of the US. Talk, talk and more talk. Almost no wrestling, let alone decent technical stuff by guys in shape, and some v. dubious family-time leather/S&M/ soft sapphic-kink stuff "for the dads." Tawdry, bad-taste-in-the-mouth stuff. Hardly a tribute to the stuff that woke us all up as adolescent lads.
Two Hot guys, both in Trunks and Boots, and great WoS Wrestling. This was wot WoS Wrestling was all about all those yrs ago. Collins takes the lead, and wins, but Kerry is great, looks Hot in the White Trunks.
Catchweight (60 min duration) Danny Boy Collins (metallic yellow trunks) vs Greg Valentine (metallic or matt white) and Greg Valentine vs Chic Cullen (3 falls bout or 60 duration)
hi old school wos wasthe best king ben john the bear mick mcmchael pat roach mighty quinn ray steel to name a few the new stuff is crap the tanning shops must be making a mint
Hi me up if you want a chat or evenue cyber wos bout mick mcmichael king Ben John the bear skull Murphy Barry Douglas John quinn so let's wrestle wos fans
Sussexstrongman (4)
2021-02-11 오후 5:04I read today that Kendo Nagasaki in the Sixties put the Cold stream guard (Big Daddy before He piled on weight) on his shoulders.
Greenmanpin (1)
2021-02-11 오후 5:17(이 글에 대한 답글)
Bet he cpuldnt do it later!
Twister81 (5)
2018-10-29 오전 12:39What do you guys think of the new WOS ?
Punishmentwrestling (0)
2020-12-18 오전 11:12(이 글에 대한 답글)
I really do t care for it. Probably because I’m comparing it with the original.
It looks to scripted and contrived. In the original WOS we had characters and dare i say some of them could actually wrestle.
workovertheguy (11)
2020-12-17 오전 7:43(이 글에 대한 답글)
From what I've seen of it, I'd have to say, "What's the point?" It's nothing but modern day pro-wrestling. They seem to have missed the fact that what made WOS memorable was that it used an actual rule set, with refs that were there for more than just a comedy routine. When the heels cheated in the WOS days, it meant more.
Greenmanpin (1)
2020-12-14 오후 4:57(이 글에 대한 답글)
New WOS not as goodas the old stuff
Cymrofight (58)
2018-10-30 오전 11:21(이 글에 대한 답글)
Sorry for the techno-duncery, but these bouts give a flavour:
Midman46uk (0)
2021-02-19 오전 7:45(이 글에 대한 답글)
Some great matches here pal
Cymrofight (58)
2018-10-30 오전 9:53(이 글에 대한 답글)
Not seen much (only on when in gym). Seems to be the usual poorly judged UK attempt to imitate the worst of the US. Talk, talk and more talk. Almost no wrestling, let alone decent technical stuff by guys in shape, and some v. dubious family-time leather/S&M/ soft sapphic-kink stuff "for the dads." Tawdry, bad-taste-in-the-mouth stuff. Hardly a tribute to the stuff that woke us all up as adolescent lads.
LdnCG (0)
2018-10-29 오후 2:40(이 글에 대한 답글)
OK, a lot better than WWE but not as good as the original WoS
dusty rhodes (6)
2018-10-30 오전 9:44(이 글에 대한 답글)
it' sure bro!
;-)
l 17stone (1)
2018-10-29 오후 1:58(이 글에 대한 답글)
this style is better
LdnCG (0)
2018-10-29 오후 2:42(이 글에 대한 답글)
this is great! exactly the stuff I like.
NW UK WRESTLER (24)
2018-10-29 오후 2:07(이 글에 대한 답글)
I agree. This is a great bout. Hard wrestled.
l 17stone (1)
2018-10-29 오후 1:56(이 글에 대한 답글)
this is how it should be done
l 17stone (1)
2018-10-29 오후 1:55(이 글에 대한 답글)
its crap over acted with no great style
Folding Press (13)
2018-10-27 오전 9:28These are amongst my favourite bouts:
lycramike (3)
2020-12-18 오후 5:51(이 글에 대한 답글)
Two Hot guys, both in Trunks and Boots, and great WoS Wrestling. This was wot WoS Wrestling was all about all those yrs ago. Collins takes the lead, and wins, but Kerry is great, looks Hot in the White Trunks.
Folding Press (13)
2018-11-01 오전 7:17(이 글에 대한 답글)
Two bouts I'd have like to have seen are:
Catchweight (60 min duration) Danny Boy Collins (metallic yellow trunks) vs Greg Valentine (metallic or matt white) and Greg Valentine vs Chic Cullen (3 falls bout or 60 duration)
dcur (0 )
2018-11-01 오전 8:13(이 글에 대한 답글)
yes that sounds cool . how about Steve Logan v Danny Collins?
Cymrofight (58)
2018-10-30 오전 8:41(이 글에 대한 답글)
Agreed. Or Cortez v Hayward. 👍💪💦
dcur (0 )
2018-10-29 오전 6:33(이 글에 대한 답글)
yes Folding Press, these are two of my most favourite matches as well :) Greg Valantines match and Danny Collins,
NW UK WRESTLER (24)
2018-10-28 오후 3:10(이 글에 대한 답글)
Great posts.
Two great matches. Hard throughout both.
l 17stone (1)
2018-09-27 오후 3:05hi old school wos wasthe best king ben john the bear mick mcmchael pat roach mighty quinn ray steel to name a few the new stuff is crap the tanning shops must be making a mint
NW UK WRESTLER (24)
2018-10-28 오후 3:11(이 글에 대한 답글)
Loving these hard wrestled bouts.
wrestlingstar (23)
2018-09-23 오전 8:37Wayne bridges v tony saint clair.love that hot bout with a hot introduction.both wrestlers look hot in their trunks boots
16stone (2)
2018-02-01 오후 9:10lets chat wos style
16stone (2)
2017-09-25 오후 4:17Hi me up if you want a chat or evenue cyber wos bout mick mcmichael king Ben John the bear skull Murphy Barry Douglas John quinn so let's wrestle wos fans
Londonfightfan (10)
2017-10-02 오전 11:00(이 글에 대한 답글)
Always enjoy a chat about WoS wrestling, the wrestlers, the gear, etc., so will look out for you online.
lycramike (3)
2018-02-02 오전 10:23(이 글에 대한 답글)
Hi there Buddy. Would love to chat to you again,about those good old days of WoS Wrestling.
ADAMSTRONG (0)
2018-02-02 오전 10:27(이 글에 대한 답글)
Hi man , see that u don’t do Skype etc , how did we chat before ?
lycramike (3)
2018-02-02 오전 10:30(이 글에 대한 답글)
Possibly in pvt from the chatroom.
ADAMSTRONG (0)
2018-02-02 오전 10:34(이 글에 대한 답글)
Not a full member now so can’t get in chat room
lycramike (3)
2018-02-02 오전 10:46(이 글에 대한 답글)
No, im not a paid/full member either,but can use the chatroom..
Maybe it was one of the msngers, not that many use those, now Skype is here.
ADAMSTRONG (0)
2018-02-02 오전 10:57(이 글에 대한 답글)
So you want to chat in Skype ? , TRILLON only places I can chat
Folding Press (13)
2017-05-07 오전 9:02Happy to chat n wank about wos and fantasy bouts also real in tight gear
britprolwt (0)
2017-10-02 오전 12:30(이 글에 대한 답글)
Always luv dirty chat n wank about his and gay wrestling fantasy bouts.
ADAMSTRONG (0)
2016-09-17 오후 1:42Hi looking to find guys to chat to about WOS wrestling , cyber stuff e-mail matches chatting on line via Skype etc .
headscissors (0)
2017-09-25 오후 7:13(이 글에 대한 답글)
Always up for a WOS chat when online
NW UK WRESTLER (24)
2018-08-10 오후 9:32(이 글에 대한 답글)
Me 2. Enjoyed talking with you earlier. A real pleasure, wrestler.
Daren
lycramike (3)
2018-02-02 오전 10:22(이 글에 대한 답글)
Hi. Big WoS fan here and love to chat about those old days when it was on UK T/V every Sat afternoon.
LdnCG (0)
2018-02-03 오전 9:24(이 글에 대한 답글)
I totally loved those Sat afternoons in front of the tv!
16stone (2)
2018-02-03 오전 10:29(이 글에 대한 답글)
So any one like to Skype talkwos pm if you do
AndyBoy (1)
2017-05-28 오후 8:25(이 글에 대한 답글)
Me too: get in touch.
Kent Walton (0)
2017-04-19 오후 1:03(이 글에 대한 답글)
Love wos chat
dalemartin on trillian
ADAMSTRONG (0)
2017-07-10 오후 1:37(이 글에 대한 답글)
Man love to. Just to you on Trillon
Adamstrong
Here tried to add you but wouldn't let me .